
|
Board-Appointed Committees Consolidation Committee The
Consolidation Committee is a working committee appointed by the Lake
Oswego School Board. Meetings of the Consolidation Committee are open to
the public. Public participation, comment, and testimony are
not accepted during committee meetings. Comments and testimony
regarding Consolidation Committee business should be presented to the
Lake Oswego School Board in written form or during a regular School
Board meeting. The Consolidation Committee is composed of a member of each School Advisory Committee, plus five members of the Configuration Committee, two of whom are also members of the Budget Committee. |
|
The Consolidation Committee was appointed in February 2011 and serves in an advisory capacity to the School Board. School Board Charge to the Consolidation Committee:
By many measures of student achievement and performance, Lake Oswego
schools have never been stronger. At the same time, we face the most
significant economic challenge in the history of the district. Committee Purpose
Given the current economic circumstances, multiple financial strategies
will be necessary to provide the best possible educational opportunities
to our students. Significant adaptive change appears to be inevitable.
In the context of enormous financial challenges, the purpose of the
Consolidation Committee is to make school closure, consolidation, and
related boundary adjustment recommendations that would best achieve the
reduction of infrastructure costs and preserve district resources for
educational program. Committee Charge The charge to the Consolidation Committee is to develop recommendations to the School Board that best provide for the enactment of the Scenario B reconfiguration model recommended by the district’s Configuration Committee.
The
Consolidation Committee’s charge is to make recommendations to the Board
in four areas:
Definitions
Reasonableness:
Reasonableness in the context of school district reconfigurations should
be determined in relation to two critical attributes. The first test of
reasonableness should be the desirability of the option in accomplishing
the School Board’s desired outcome. The second test of reasonableness
should be the feasibility of accomplishing the School Board’s desired
outcome in relation to its functionality and adherence to the School
Board’s approved guidelines.
The Committee is expected to present its recommendations at the School Board meeting on April 12, 2011. Meetings: (held at Lake Oswego High School Library)
At its March 7 meeting,
Consolidation Committee members arrived at the following tentative
determination: If the School Board decides that it is necessary to
move forward with school reconfiguration/closure for 2011-12, the
Consolidation Committee would recommend the implementation of Scenario B
as follows:
In arriving at this determination, the Consolidation
Committee tested and verified the workability of Scenario B in the
context of the economic challenges facing the district. The successful
implementation of Scenario B would require some changes in building
utilization and program adjustments that could affect the location of
district preschool, pre-k, Spanish immersion kindergarten and full day
kindergarten classrooms. The committee modeled Scenario B using a
classroom teacher:student ratio of 1:27. The Consolidation Committee will meet again on
Wednesday at 5:30 p.m. in the Lake Oswego High School library to
continue developing its recommendations and to begin looking at school
boundary options. It is important to emphasize that the School Board
has not made a final decision regarding school reconfiguration/closures;
the Board is scheduled to make its decision on April 5. The
Consolidation Committee will present its recommendations to the School
Board on March 14. The meeting update that
was published following the March 7 meeting of the Consolidation
Committee indicated that a “tentative determination” had been reached
regarding Scenario B. This statement was inaccurate. More accurately, in
response to the charge from the School Board to determine the
workability of Scenario B, a majority of the committee indicated the
belief that the scenario is workable where “workable” is defined as the
ability to implement the scenario if necessary. This decision regarding
Scenario B workability did not constitute a recommendation or
determination. Last night, the committee again discussed the
workability of Scenario B. While, as noted, the committee believes
Scenario B is workable, the committee also noted a number of concerns
about school capacity and, specifically, continues to review the
availability of rooms to support all current programs under this
scenario. As a result, the committee is still considering
whether Scenario B is the best option given its plusses and minuses, and
is exploring other options in addition to Scenario B. The following summarizes the two options now being
studied by the Consolidation Committee and progress to date:
In light of the need for additional time to explore
these options, the School Board will establish a new timeline for
potential school configuration/closure decisions at its meeting on March
14. In lieu of making its recommendations on March 14, the Consolidation
Committee will provide a progress update to the School Board. The Consolidation Committee has scheduled its next
meeting for Wednesday, March 16 at 5:30 p.m. in the LOHS library. The Consolidation Committee meeting continued its
analysis and modeling of class size ratios, building utilization, and
school boundaries. The following scenarios remain under
discussion/review:
While no formal determinations have been made, the
committee is in general agreement that Scenario B appears to be workable
and that room availability would be generally acceptable. The committee
will continue to study space issues and possible solutions at some
schools relative to music, preschool, kindergarten enrichment, and
immersion kindergarten programs.
Committee members have identified significant
boundary issues with Scenario B Modified if this scenario were to be
implemented as a transitional step to the full implementation of
Scenario B. The committee will continue to study Scenario B Modified as
a potential single long-term solution. While no formal determinations
have been made, the committee is in general agreement that Scenario B
Modified also appears to be workable relative to room availability. This
scenario improves room availability for south side schools relative to
music, preschool, kindergarten enrichment, and immersion kindergarten
programs, but the north side limitations are identical to those
identified in Scenario B. The committee will continue to study space
issues and possible solutions at some schools relative to music,
preschool, kindergarten enrichment, and immersion kindergarten programs.
At the request of the school board, the committee
will explore Scenario A as a bridge option, which would provide more
time to study Scenario B for possible year two or later implementation.
Committee members expressed concerns that, as a transitional strategy,
Scenario A could have negative consequences for some families who might
have to change schools twice. The committee did not have time to begin
significant analysis of implications of this scenario and will continue
to study Scenario A at its next meeting. After looking at the various scenarios, a number of
committee members strongly expressed their concerns regarding the
financial inadequacies of Scenario B Modified and Scenario A relative to
the enormity of the $13M shortfall facing the district over the next two
years. The Consolidation Committee reached several determinations regarding its recommendations for school configuration and closures:
The committee will present its full report and recommendations to the School Board on Tuesday, April 12.
The School Board received the report and recommendations from the Consolidation Committee on April 12. Following the report, the School Board asked the committee to reconvene and develop a recommendation for one additional scenario so that the Board will have a full and complete range of options prior to its decision on school consolidation on April 25. The Consolidation Committee will meet on Monday, April 18 to develop a recommendation for a Scenario A closure and boundary reconfiguration for one south-side elementary school. The Board’s direction to the Consolidation Committee is that this Scenario A recommendation should be developed as a stand-alone recommendation for a single school closure, and not as a bridge strategy to the full implementation of Scenario B.
|